WEKO3
アイテム
象徴作用と想像力が開く遊びの世界―遊びの哲学としてのホワイトヘッド宇宙論―
https://ryujo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/486
https://ryujo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4865b8254d7-d63b-42b6-baf4-8899862c2ef7
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
象徴作用と想像力が開く遊びの世界―遊びの哲学としてのホワイトヘッド宇宙論― (1.1 MB)
|
Copyright（c）2020 by Nagoya Ryujo Junior College
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-07-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 象徴作用と想像力が開く遊びの世界―遊びの哲学としてのホワイトヘッド宇宙論― | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Playful World Disclosed through Symbolism and Imagination: Whitehead ’s Cosmology as a Philosophy of Play | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 遊びの哲学 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 想像力 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 象徴作用 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 思弁哲学 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | ホワイトヘッド | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
村田, 康常
× 村田, 康常
× Murata, Yasuto
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | What is play? Where does play lead one’s imagination? How does play open up its world? The purpose of this paper is to clarify these questions from the speculative standpoint of Whitehead’s “philosophy of organism.” After raising the aforementioned qu estions in Chapter I, I examine the relationship between play and imagination, both of which Whitehead considers to be central functions within speculation. My arguments in Chapter II are based on Whitehead’s emphasis on the role of “play of a free imagin ation” in speculative philosophy. He suggests that play releases us from the constraints of the actual world to the free horizon of the imagination. In Chapter III, in order to consider the purpose of the world of play in the conflicting traits between t he trend of repeating what is familiar and the aspiration for novelty, I refer to Whitehead’s discussion about the contrast between the two conflicted aspects of the actual world, that is, the “creative advance into novelty” and the “conservative repetitio n of what is beloved.” In Chapter IV, I f ocus on symbolic activity in play. In the theory of symbolism, Whitehead notes that, by virtue of the symbolic reference, which he defines as “the imagined fusion of the two perceptive modes by one intensity of e motion,” we realize that thee actual world ias a meaningful one in which all items show their own values. I come to the conclusion that the characteristic of play exists in the symbolic superposition of images envisaged through imagination on the mere fac ts from the actual world. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
柳城子ども学研究 巻 3, p. 11-39, 発行日 2020-03-20 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 名古屋柳城短期大学 | |||||||||||
